Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines
© Marshall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 11 March 2009
Accepted: 28 July 2009
Published: 28 July 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Mar 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chiu-Hsieh (Paul) Hsu|
|10 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stef van Buuren|
|15 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hakan Demirtas|
|4 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Marshall|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hakan Demirtas|
|7 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Marshall|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|7 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Andrea Marshall|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|16 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|28 Jul 2009||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jul 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-9-57|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.