Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Determining relative importance of variables in developing and validating predictive models

  • Joseph Beyene1, 3, 4Email author,
  • Eshetu G Atenafu1,
  • Jemila S Hamid1,
  • Teresa To1, 3, 4 and
  • Lillian Sung1, 2, 4
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Research Methodology20099:64

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-64

Received: 21 November 2008

Accepted: 14 September 2009

Published: 14 September 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Nov 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shuangge Ma
19 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xiaowei Yang
27 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yuhong Yang
6 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Duolao Wang
11 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shuangge Ma
12 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xiaowei Yang
30 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
30 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 7
30 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
30 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 8
30 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 8
23 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shuangge Ma
11 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 9
11 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
11 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 10
11 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 10
11 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 11
11 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 11
11 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jemila Hamid
Resubmission - Version 12
11 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 12
Publishing
14 Sep 2009 Editorially accepted
14 Sep 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-64

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Child Heath Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children
(2)
Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children
(3)
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
(4)
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto

Advertisement