Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses

  • Jørn Wetterslev1Email author,
  • Kristian Thorlund1,
  • Jesper Brok1 and
  • Christian Gluud1
BMC Medical Research Methodology20099:86

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-86

Received: 15 May 2009

Accepted: 30 December 2009

Published: 30 December 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Turner
21 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
24 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jørn Wetterslev
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
12 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Turner
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jørn Wetterslev
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
30 Dec 2009 Editorially accepted
30 Dec 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-86

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 3344, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Advertisement