Erratum to: Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study
© The Author(s). 2017
Published: 22 March 2017
After publication of the original article , it came to the authors’ attention that there was an error affecting the References. The published Reference 14  is incorrect, and should have cited a different article by Pate et al. .
Pate et al.  should have been included in the Reference list as 14, and the subsequent references (and citations within the article text) should have been renumbered.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Candlish J, Pate A, Sperrin M, van Staa T, GetReal Work Package 2. Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17:17. doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0295-7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Zhu S, Yao GL, Mohammed MA, Marshall T. Patient factors influencing the prescribing of lipid lowering drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in UK general practice: a national retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):1–10.Google Scholar
- Pate A, Candlish J, Sperrin M, Van Staa TP. Cohort Multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCT) design: efficient but biased? A simulation study to evaluate the feasibility of the Cluster cmRCT design. BMC Med Res Meth. 2016;16:109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar