Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance

  • Tri-Long Nguyen1, 2,
  • Gary S. Collins3,
  • Jessica Spence2,
  • Jean-Pierre Daurès1,
  • P. J. Devereaux2, 4,
  • Paul Landais1, 5 and
  • Yannick Le Manach2Email author
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:78

DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0338-0

Received: 6 November 2016

Accepted: 4 April 2017

Published: 28 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sylvie Chevret
23 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M. Sanni Ali
22 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tri-Long Nguyen
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
4 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0338-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Clinical Research and Health Economics, UPRES EA2415, Montpellier University
(2)
Departments of Anesthesia & Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University and the Perioperative Research Group, Population Health Research Institute
(3)
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford
(4)
Departments of Medicine, Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University
(5)
Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Medical Informatics, Nîmes University Hospital

Advertisement