Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

On the impact of nonresponse in logistic regression: application to the 45 and Up study

BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:80

DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0355-z

Received: 19 October 2016

Accepted: 27 April 2017

Published: 8 May 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Gunzler
20 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wan Tang
11 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Joanna Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Joanna Wang
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
8 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0355-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney
(2)
The Sax Institute
(3)
The Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS)
(4)
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Advertisement