Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Updating a systematic review – what difference did it make? Case study of nicotine replacement therapy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Apr 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Apr 2001 Author responded Author comments - Lindsay Stead
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Apr 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Sep 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julian Higgins
1 Oct 2001 Author responded Author comments - Lindsay Stead
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Oct 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Oct 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julian Higgins
25 Oct 2001 Author responded Author comments - Lindsay Stead
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Oct 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
1 Nov 2001 Editorially accepted
1 Nov 2001 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-1-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement