Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison between review results for nicotine gum in 1994 and 2000

From: Updating a systematic review – what difference did it make? Case study of nicotine replacement therapy

 

Review year

1994

2000

a) All trials

No. of trials

38

48

 

Odds ratio

1.64

1.63

 

95% CI

1.48–1.81

1.49–1.79

 

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

43.94 (p = 0.2)

55.22 (p = 0.19)

b) Level of support sub group*:

No. of trials

17

19

-Low intensity

Odds ratio

1.81

1.72

 

95% CI

1.54–2.12

1.48–2.00

 

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

22.76 (p = 0.12)

25.71 (p = 0.11)

-High intensity

No. of trials

18

25

 

Odds ratio

1.55

1.56

 

95% CI

1.33–1.80

1.37–1.78

 

Χ2 & p for heterogeneity

17.44 (p = 0.42)

22.61 (p = 0.54)

  1. *Level of support could not be assessed for all trials.