The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Mar 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jun 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Vickers|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Jun 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Jun 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew Vickers|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|28 Jun 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Jun 2001||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jun 2001||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-1-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.