Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Mar 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jun 2001 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Vickers
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jun 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Jun 2001 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Vickers
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Jun 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jun 2001 Editorially accepted
28 Jun 2001 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-1-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement