Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jul 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jul 2001 Author responded Author comments - Sheena Derry
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jul 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Aug 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Phil Wiffen
10 Aug 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Lau
16 Aug 2001 Author responded Author comments - Sheena Derry
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Aug 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Aug 2001 Author responded Author comments - Sheena Derry
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Aug 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
3 Sep 2001 Editorially accepted
3 Sep 2001 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-1-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement