This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials
© Derry et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 12 July 2001
Accepted: 3 September 2001
Published: 3 September 2001
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Jul 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jul 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Sheena Derry|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jul 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Aug 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phil Wiffen|
|10 Aug 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Lau|
|16 Aug 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Sheena Derry|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Aug 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Aug 2001||Author responded||Author comments - Sheena Derry|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|31 Aug 2001||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Sep 2001||Editorially accepted|
|3 Sep 2001||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-1-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.