Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Categorisation of continuous exposure variables revisited. A response to the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Gillman
3 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harold de Valk
22 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Gillman
1 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Kathrine Frey Frøslie
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
9 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
9 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-103

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement