Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Objectively-assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johanne Higgins
15 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Louise Gustafsson
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johanne Higgins
27 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Corina Schuster-Amft
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Corina Schuster-Amft
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
26 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Corina Schuster-Amft
Resubmission - Version 8
26 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
29 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-106

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement