Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angel Cronin
20 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jørgen Hilden
3 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luiz Zeferino
12 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Brandy Ringham
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angel Cronin
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Brandy Ringham
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement