Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Missing the forest (plot) for the trees? A critique of the systematic review in tobacco control

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Laura Rosen
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Tricco
15 Jan 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay Stead
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Laura Rosen
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Laura Rosen
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
18 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Tricco
12 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Laura Rosen
Resubmission - Version 9
12 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
25 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement