Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: Impact on response rate and quality

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Feb 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan VanGeest
11 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helene Feveile
16 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Powers
22 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie Pirotta
8 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Funkhouser
5 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Beebe
Resubmission - Version 2
5 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Powers
19 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Beebe
Resubmission - Version 3
19 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Beebe
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
8 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-50

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement