Skip to main content

Table 5 Measurement and structural invariance across gender at cycle 1 Seniors (65 years old and over; n = 2525)

From: A life-course and time perspective on the construct validity of psychological distress in women and men. Measurement invariance of the K6 across gender

Level of invariance

X2

df

p value

CFI

TLI

RMSEA

Δχ2

dfc

p value

Measurement invariance

     

   M1. Configural

35.8

14

< .0001

0.994

0.994

0.035

N/A

   M2. Metric (vs. M1)

22.9

15

< .0001

0.998

0.998

0.020

0.634

5

0.9864

   M3. Tau equivalence (vs. M2)

249.1

19

< .0001

0.934

0.955

0.098

207.3

5

< .0001

   M4. Scalar - Complete (vs. M2)

60.8

23

< .0001

0.989

0.994

0.036

54.6

12

< .0001

   M5. Scalar - Partial a (vs. M2)

32.7

20

< .0001

0.996

0.998

0.022

20.9

9

0.0132

   M6. Scale factor - Partialb (vs. M5)

41.3

22

< .0001

0.994

0.997

0.026

22.9

10

0.0112

Structural invariance

     

   M7. Latent variance (vs. M6)

26.6

16

< .0001

0.997

0.998

0.023

0.324

1

0.5691

   M8. Latent means (vs. M7)

88.4

15

< .0001

0.979

0.982

0.062

36.7

2

< .0001

  1. a The constraint of equal item threshold was relaxed for item C (restless or fidgety) and item D (hopeless).
  2. b Complete invariance of the scale factors could not be investigated since items C and D had to be unconstrained in the preceding models (i.e., metric or scalar invariance model). No additional items were freed to reach partial scale factor invariance.
  3. c The degrees of freedom for the chi-square tests are adjusted for the WLSMV estimator and do not correspond to difference of degrees of freedom between the more constrained and the less constrained model.