Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Determining the interviewer effect on CQ Index outcomes: a multilevel approach

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Sjenny Winters
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Howard Degenholtz
12 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dario Gregori
14 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sjenny Winters
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Howard Degenholtz
30 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dario Gregori
18 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sjenny Winters
Resubmission - Version 4
18 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Howard Degenholtz
4 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sjenny Winters
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sjenny Winters
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sjenny Winters
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
19 Aug 2010 Editorially accepted
19 Aug 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-75

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement