Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Interpretation of evidence in data by untrained medical students: a scenario-based study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gitte Lindgaard
18 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonius Schneider
20 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yoshinori Noguchi
29 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luis Silva
14 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Perneger
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luis Silva
4 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonius Schneider
8 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yoshinori Noguchi
24 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Perneger
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Aug 2010 Editorially accepted
26 Aug 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-10-78

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement