Interpretation of evidence in data by untrained medical students: a scenario-based study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Jun 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gitte Lindgaard|
|18 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonius Schneider|
|20 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yoshinori Noguchi|
|29 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luis Silva|
|14 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Perneger|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luis Silva|
|4 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonius Schneider|
|8 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yoshinori Noguchi|
|24 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Perneger|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|26 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-10-78|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.