This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
What differences are detected by superiority trials or ruled out by noninferiority trials? A cross-sectional study on a random sample of two-hundred two-arms parallel group randomized clinical trials
© Gayet-Ageron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 26 April 2010
Accepted: 15 October 2010
Published: 15 October 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Apr 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Apr 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Angèle Gayet-Ageron|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Apr 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vance Berger|
|6 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yuliya Lokhnygina|
|27 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Angèle Gayet-Ageron|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vance Berger|
|12 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yuliya Lokhnygina|
|15 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Angèle Gayet-Ageron|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Oct 2010||Editorially accepted|
|15 Oct 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-10-93|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.