Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The case study approach

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Bigby
25 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine
27 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten
26 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Crowe
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Crowe
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine
19 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten
17 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Crowe
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine
3 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Crowe
Resubmission - Version 6
31 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
27 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
27 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement