Open Peer Review Reports for: The case study approach
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Bigby |
| 25 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
| 26 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine |
| 19 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
| 17 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 17 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Watine |
| 3 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Willem Herbert van Harten |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 31 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Crowe |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 31 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
