Self-perceived quality of life predicts mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel, but the combination of both does best
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luis Rosero-Bixby|
|5 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lijana Zaletel-Kragelj|
|31 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Robin Haring|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luis Rosero-Bixby|
|22 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Robin Haring|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Jul 2011||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jul 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-11-103|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.