Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Imputation by the mean score should be avoided when validating a Patient Reported Outcomes questionnaire by a Rasch model in presence of informative missing data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul De Boeck
11 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mike Kenward
31 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul De Boeck
17 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
14 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-105

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement