Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of indicators of material circumstances in the context of an epidemiological study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Wong
8 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Fiedler
18 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leena Koivusilta
30 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marie-Claude Rousseau
Resubmission - Version 3
30 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Fiedler
17 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Wong
22 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leena Koivusilta
11 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marie-Claude Rousseau
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Marie-Claude Rousseau
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
18 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-108

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement