Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Joyce
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeanette Ziegenfuss
1 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan VanGeest
3 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oyvind Bjertnaes
31 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Joyce
Resubmission - Version 3
31 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan VanGeest
17 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeanette Ziegenfuss
17 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oyvind Bjertnaes
9 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Joyce
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Joyce
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Catherine Joyce
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
5 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
5 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-126

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement