Timmer instrument for observational studies | 2000 | 2008 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
oral | poster | 0ral | poster | |||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Question/objective sufficiently described? | 50 | 65 | 36 | 77 | 73 | 74 | 25 | 63 |
Design evident and appropriate to answer study question? | 75 | 97 | 46 | 98 | 95 | 97 | 61 | 95 |
Subject characteristics sufficiently described? | 45 | 58 | 27 | 57 | 61 | 62 | 36 | 56 |
Subjects appropriate to the study question? | 68 | 88 | 41 | 87 | 95 | 97 | 54 | 84 |
Method of subject selection described and appropriate? | 61 | 79 | 44 | 94 | 81 | 83 | 52 | 81 |
Outcome measure well defined and robust to measurement bias? Means of assessment reported? | 25 | 32 | 18 | 38 | 73 | 74 | 37 | 58 |
Confounding accounted for? | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sample size adequate? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Post hoc power calculations or confidence intervals reported for statistically non significant results? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Statistical analyses appropriate? | 71 | 92 | 35 | 74 | 89 | 91 | 57 | 89 |
Statistical tests stated? | 15 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 27 | 28 | 10 | 16 |
Exact p-values or confidence intervals stated? | 72 | 92 | 40 | 85 | 90 | 92 | 58 | 88 |
Attrition of subjects and reason for attrition recorded? | 34 | 44 | 20 | 43 | 54 | 55 | 42 | 66 |
Results reported in sufficient detail? | 74 | 96 | 40 | 85 | 82 | 84 | 61 | 98 |
Do the results support the conclusions? | 72 | 94 | 45 | 96 | 89 | 91 | 56 | 88 |
Sum (items 1-15) |