Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What counts as reliable evidence for public health policy: the case of circumcision for preventing HIV infection

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan L Norris
26 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Moses
10 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Armstrong
11 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Reidar Lie
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan L Norris
7 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Reidar Lie
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Reidar Lie
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Mar 2011 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement