Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of posterior means and credible intervals of the ORs

From: Bayesian adjustment for measurement error in continuous exposures in an individually matched case-control study

  OR 95% Cred. Int. Adjusted OR 95% Cred. Int.
Naive analysis     
   PFOA 0.905 (0.661, 1.209) 0.828 (0.584, 1.127)
   PFOS 0.802 (0.495, 1.214) 0.752 (0.445, 1.181)
   PFHxS 1.315 (0.964, 1.755) 1.302 (0.934, 1.779)
Measurement error analysis    
   PFOA 0.904 (0.656, 1.212) 0.821 (0.568, 1.131)
   PFOS 0.794 (0.482, 1.221) 0.743 (0.431, 1.191)
   PFHxS 1.333 (0.960, 1.816) 1.329 (0.938, 1.856)
  1. Posterior means and 95% equal-tailed credible intervals of the ORs for the simple model and the model adjusted for confounding variables. Results are presented for the Bayesian naive analysis and for the Bayesian method proposed to correct for measurement error.