Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A comparison of a new multinomial stopping rule with stopping rules of fleming and gehan in single arm phase II cancer clinical trials

BMC Medical Research Methodology201111:95

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-95

Received: 5 November 2010

Accepted: 21 June 2011

Published: 21 June 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Junfeng Liu
2 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - hubert Schouten
16 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - John Goffin
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - hubert Schouten
17 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - John Goffin
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - John Goffin
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
21 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-11-95

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(2)
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(3)
Dongsheng Tu, NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada

Advertisement