This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
What inference for two-stage phase II trials?
© Porcher and Desseaux; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 12 October 2011
Accepted: 25 June 2012
Published: 6 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yi Cheng|
|19 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jack Bowden|
|4 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valeria Sambucini|
|25 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Raphael Porcher|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yi Cheng|
|11 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jack Bowden|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valeria Sambucini|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-117|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.