Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - KYEONG UOON KIM
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Moseley
16 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ted Haines
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Moseley
29 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - KYEONG UOON KIM
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - KYEONG UOON KIM
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - KYEONG UOON KIM
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
24 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
28 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-129

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement