Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serena McCluskey
7 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lin Fritschi
20 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Martha Sinclair
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Martha Sinclair
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lin Fritschi
15 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serena McCluskey
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
31 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-132

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement