This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models?
© Hayduk and Littvay; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 June 2011
Accepted: 14 October 2012
Published: 22 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Geiser|
|1 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - conor dolan|
|27 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Les Hayduk|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Geiser|
|17 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - conor dolan|
|2 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Les Hayduk|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-159|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.