This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The use of individual cut points from treadmill walking to assess free-living moderate to vigorous physical activity in obese subjects by accelerometry: is it useful?
© Aadland and Steene-Johannessen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 May 2012
Accepted: 6 November 2012
Published: 15 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Niels Christian Møller|
|7 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Romaina Iqbal|
|14 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eivind Aadland|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Niels Christian Møller|
|24 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eivind Aadland|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Niels Christian Møller|
|1 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eivind Aadland|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|1 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|6 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|15 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-172|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.