Skip to main content

Table 5 Minor inconsistencies between conference abstract and final full text publication (n = 76) for all studies, as well as for randomized-controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies

From: Assessment of reporting quality of conference abstracts in sports injury prevention according to CONSORT and STROBE criteria and their subsequent publication rate as full papers

 

RCT

Observational studies

Experimental study design

Total Publications

 

Percentage %

95% CI

Percentage %

95% CI

N

Percentage %

95% CI

n

Minor inconsistency

10 (100%)

69-100

63 (100%)

94-100

3

76 (100%)

77-94

76

Title was different

8 (80%)

44-97

55 (87%)

77-94

0

66 (87%)

6-23

10

Author was different

5 (50%)

19-81

36 (57%)

44-70

2

42 (55%)

43-67

34

Research center was different

1 (10%)

0.2-45

11 (17%)

9-29

3

36 (16%)

36-60

64

Presentation was different

10 (100%)

69-100

60 (95%)

87-99

0

73 (96%)

89-99

3

Interpretation was different

2 (20%)

3-56

16 (25%)

15-38

2

19 (25%)

16-36

57