Skip to main content

Table 6 Major inconsistencies between conference abstract and final publication (n = 76) for all studies, as well as for randomized-controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies

From: Assessment of reporting quality of conference abstracts in sports injury prevention according to CONSORT and STROBE criteria and their subsequent publication rate as full papers

 

RCT

Observational studies

Experimental study design

Total Publications

 

Percentage %

95% CI

Percentage %

95% CI

N

 

95% CI

n

Major inconsistency

8 (80%)

44-97

41 (54%)

52-77

0

49 (65%)

53-75

49

Study hypothesis different

0 (0%)

0-30

7 (11%)

5-22

3

10 (13%)

6-23

69

Study design different

0 (0%)

0-30

8 (13%)

6-24

3

11 (15%)

7-24

68

Primary outcome measure different

1 (10%)

0-46

10 (16%)

8-27

3

14(18%)

10-29

65

Sample size different

7 (70%)

35-93

25 (40%)

28-53

0

32 (42%)

31-54

32

Increased

4 (40%)

12-74

15 (24%)

14-36

0

19 (25%)

23-45

19

Decreased

3 (30%)

7-65

12 (19%)

10-31

0

15 (20%)

11-30

15

Not stated*

0 (%)

0-30

4 (6%)

2-16

2

6 (8%)

3-16

6

Sample size same

3 (30%)

7-65

32 (51%)

38-64

1

36 (48%)

36-59

36

Statistic Not stated

9 (90%)

56-100

59 (94%)

85-98

3

71 (93%)

85-98

71

Same

1 (10%)

0-46

2 (3%)

0-11

0

3 (4%)

1-11

3

Result different

9 (90%)

56-100

43 (68%)

55-79

3

55 (72%)

60-82

24

Data added

6 (60%)

26-88

19 (30%)

19-43

0

25 (33%)

23-45

25

Data deleted

4 (40%)

12-74

19 (30%)

19-43

0

23 (30%)

20-42

23

Complete changed

0

0-30

3 (5%)

1-13

0

3 (4%)

1-11

3

SD/CI/, Injury rate, Incidence

changed

3 (30%)

7-65

15 (24%)

14-36

0

18 (24%)

15-35

18

  1. *in both conference and full-text abstract