This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies—a paradox of statistical practice?
© Fagerland; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 January 2012
Accepted: 14 June 2012
Published: 14 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Donald Zimmerman|
|6 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ZHENZHEN XU|
|13 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser|
|19 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Morten Wang Fagerland|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser|
|19 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ZHENZHEN XU|
|3 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Morten Wang Fagerland|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-12-78|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.