Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies—a paradox of statistical practice?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donald Zimmerman
6 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ZHENZHEN XU
13 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser
19 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Morten Wang Fagerland
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser
19 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ZHENZHEN XU
3 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Morten Wang Fagerland
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
14 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-78

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement