Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Research Methodology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies—a paradox of statistical practice?

BMC Medical Research Methodology201212:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-78

Received: 11 January 2012

Accepted: 14 June 2012

Published: 14 June 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donald Zimmerman
6 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ZHENZHEN XU
13 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser
19 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Morten Wang Fagerland
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus Neuhäuser
19 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ZHENZHEN XU
3 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Morten Wang Fagerland
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
14 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-78

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unit of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital

Advertisement