Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Benefits of extensive recruitment effort persist during follow-ups and are consistent across age group and survey method. The TRAILS study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Aug 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marion Henderson
14 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Ware
10 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Esther Nederhof
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Ware
7 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marion Henderson
13 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Esther Nederhof
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Ware
27 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Esther Nederhof
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 May 2012 Editorially accepted
2 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-12-93

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement