Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the risk factors effects between two populations: two alternative approaches illustrated by the analysis of first and second kidney transplant recipients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Katy Trebern-Launay
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Katy Trebern-Launay
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Katy Trebern-Launay
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Landais
17 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noori Akhtar-Danesh
26 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Katy Trebern-Launay
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
29 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Landais
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
1 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-102

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement