Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Marlies van Lent
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin
7 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Doshi
3 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Marlies van Lent
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin
16 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Doshi
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
30 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-120

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement