Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Marlies van Lent|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin|
|7 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Doshi|
|3 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Marlies van Lent|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin|
|16 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Doshi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|30 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-13-120|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.