Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller
4 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
4 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Pfeiffer
5 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Patrick Royston
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruth Pfeiffer
28 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Patrick Royston
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
1 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Glenn Heller
11 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Patrick Royston
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Harrell
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-33

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement