Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
24 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Senn
26 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Mills
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julian Higgins
2 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
5 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Georgia Salanti
21 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ulrike Krahn
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Mills
4 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Georgia Salanti
6 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Senn
14 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Viechtbauer
28 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
20 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ulrike Krahn
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
25 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-35

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement