Advancing current approaches to disease management evaluation: capitalizing on heterogeneity to understand what works and for whom
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bendix Carstensen|
|3 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrike Rothe|
|16 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Monica Taljaard|
|8 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Arianne Elissen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrike Rothe|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-13-40|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.