Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Overview of data-synthesis in systematic reviews of studies on outcome prediction models

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ricardo V Bessa-Nogueira
13 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Betsy Jane Becker
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tobias van den Berg
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ricardo V Bessa-Nogueira
10 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Betsy Jane Becker
21 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tobias van den Berg
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tobias van den Berg
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
4 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
16 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement