Empirical comparison of methods for analyzing multiple time-to-event outcomes in a non-inferiority trial: a breast cancer study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Marshall|
|18 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shulian Shang|
|19 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Sameer Parpia|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Marshall|
|4 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shulian Shang|
|7 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Sameer Parpia|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|21 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-13-44|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.