Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Empirical comparison of methods for analyzing multiple time-to-event outcomes in a non-inferiority trial: a breast cancer study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Marshall
18 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shulian Shang
19 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sameer Parpia
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Marshall
4 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shulian Shang
7 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sameer Parpia
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
12 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
21 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-44

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement