Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
23 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Levac
1 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Grant
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Helena Daudt
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Levac
14 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Grant
25 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Helena Daudt
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Levac
19 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Grant
27 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Helena Daudt
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Helena Daudt
Resubmission - Version 7
27 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
6 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danielle Levac
29 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Grant
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
31 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
23 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement