Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Phase IV non-inferiority trials and additional claims of benefit

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Rosemarie DLC Bernabe
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Rosemarie DLC Bernabe
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jörg Zinserling
15 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerd Rosenkranz
7 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rosemarie DLC Bernabe
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jörg Zinserling
26 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rosemarie DLC Bernabe
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rosemarie DLC Bernabe
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
27 May 2013 Editorially accepted
30 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-13-70

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement