Table 2 Summary of the person selection probability, composite and benchmark weight statistics for each of the frames

Landline Frame (n = 2171)

Adult and children (n = 2171)

All types (n = 2171)

Interviews divided by universe of phone numbers

$\frac{t_h^A}{T_h^A}$

2.68

0.0012

0.0007

0.00017

0.0041

Lines in household divided by eligible persons in household

$\frac{T_{\mathit{jh}}^A}{N_{\mathit{jh}}}$

1216.69

0.5699

0.50000

0.11111

3.0000

Person selection probability $\left({\pi }_{\mathit{ijh}}^A\right)$

$\frac{t_{{}_h}^A}{T_h^A}\frac{T_{\mathit{jh}}^A}{N_{\mathit{jh}}}$

1.59

0.0007

0.0003

0.00003

0.0082

Selection weight $\left(w_{\mathit{ijh}}^A\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_{\mathit{ijh}}^A}$

8939582

4113.94

2864.6

121.31

35214.76

Landline only (n = 383)

Selection weight $\left(w_{\mathit{ijh}}^A\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_{\mathit{ijh}}^A}$

1074321

2805.02

1725.43

121.31

29345.64

Both (n = 1788)

Selection weight $\left(w_{\mathit{ijh}}^A\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_{\mathit{ijh}}^A}$

78765261

4394.00

2911.00

169.30

35214.76

Composite weight $\left(w_{\mathit{ijh}}^{\lambda }\right)$ (where λ = 0.5)

$\lambda w_{\mathit{ijh}}^A$

3932630

2197.00

1455.50

84.65

17607.38

Mobile Frame (n = 1207)

Adults (n = 1069)

All types (n = 1069)

Interviews divided by universe of phone numbers

$\frac{t^B}{T_B}$

0.14

0.0001

0.0001

0.00013

0.0001

Mobile phones for person divided by eligible persons (where N _i  = 1)

$\frac{T_i^B}{N_i}$

1168.00

1.0947

1.00000

1.00000

5.0000

Person selection probability $\left({\pi }_i^B\right)$

$\frac{t^B}{T^B}\frac{T_i^B}{N_i}$

0.15

0.0001

0.00013

0.00013

0.0007

Selection weight $\left(w_i^B\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_i^B}$

7819874

7328.84

7655.04

1531.01

7655.04

Mobile only (n = 284)

Selection weight $\left(w_i^B\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_i^B}$

2071325

7319.17

7655.04

1913.76

7655.04

Both (n = 785)

Selection weight $\left(w_{i^B}\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_i^B}$

5748549

7332.33

7655.04

1531.01

7655.04

Composite weight $\left(w_i^{\lambda }\right)$

$\left(1-\lambda \right)w_i^B$

2874274

3666.17

3827.52

765.50

3827.52

Children (n = 138)

All types (n = 138)

Parents probability of selection

${\pi }_p^B$

0.02

0.0001

0.0001

0.00013

0.0003

Number of parents divided by eligible children in household

$\frac{N_{\mathit{cp}}}{N_{\mathit{cj}}}$

177.57

1.2867

1.00000

0.33333

2.0000

Person selection probability $\left({\pi }_{\mathit{cp}}^B\right)$

${\pi }_p^B\frac{N_{\mathit{cp}}}{N_{\mathit{cj}}}$

0.03

0.0002

0.0001

0.00004

0.0005

Selection weight $\left(w_{\mathit{cp}}^B\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_{\mathit{cp}}^B}$

964534

6989.38

7655.04

1913.76

22965.11

Mobile only (n = 26)

Selection weight $\left(w_{\mathit{cp}}^B\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_{\mathit{cp}}^B}$

158842

6109.31

3827.52

1913.76

15310.07

Both (n = 112)

Selection weight $\left(w_{\mathit{cp}}^B\right)$

$\frac{1}{{\pi }_{\mathit{cp}}^B}$

805692

7193.68

7655.04

1913.76

22965.11

Composite weight $\left(w_{\mathit{cp}}^{\lambda }\right)$

$\left(1-\lambda \right)w_{\mathit{cp}}^B$

402846

3596.84

3827.52

956.88

11482.55

Both frames (n = 3378)

Adults and children (n = 3378)

All types (n = 3378)

Selection weight (composite for both users) -see note (a)

$w_i^U$

10514239

3112.56

2934.56

84.65

29345.64

Selection weight (composite for both users) scaled back to the number of respondents

$w_i^{U*}$

3378

1.00000

0.8698

0.04779

10.999

Post stratification weight (benchmarked to the population by age × sex × health admin) $\left(W_i^U\right)$

$\frac{N_{\mathit{dh}}}{{\widehat{N}}_{\mathit{dh}}}{w}_i^{U^{*}}$

7272086

2152.78

1634.97

13.54

21807