Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - sarah donegan|
|25 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristian Thorlund|
|7 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Georgia Salanti|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - sarah donegan|
|29 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristian Thorlund|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|19 Sep 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-14-106|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.