Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - sarah donegan
25 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristian Thorlund
7 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Georgia Salanti
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - sarah donegan
29 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristian Thorlund
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
19 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-106

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement