Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Dec 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Megan Morris
15 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Thomas
16 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Megan Morris
6 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Megan Morris
28 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Thomas
9 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Thomas
28 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
10 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
20 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-108

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement