Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving the error rates of the Begg and Mazumdar test for publication bias in fixed effects meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Apr 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Miriam Gjerdevik
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Miriam Gjerdevik
Resubmission - Version 3
21 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dan Jackson
11 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul-Christian Bürkner
21 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitris Mavridis
18 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Miriam Gjerdevik
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitris Mavridis
4 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Miriam Gjerdevik
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
22 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-14-109

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement